Share This Article
The mosaic art we create is one of the most important things in our lives. For me, I love the process of building mosaics in my back yard with the paper I use to make them. But I also love the finished piece I receive from the artist. I feel like mosaic art is the best form of art because it brings the viewer into the experience and makes it into a story.
What makes mosaic art special is that it is an art form that requires the viewer to have a certain level of sensory engagement. And, of course, the best mosaics are the ones that make you feel something. In mosaic art, the viewer is in a place where there’s not much else to do but look, and that’s a big challenge.
But the challenge turns out to be the challenge, because the art piece I receive is an abstract mosaic of colored squares. I feel like the artist has taken a photo of a piece of paper and then placed colored dots on top of it. I can see it being a piece of art because it makes me feel something.
In the past, we’ve had a bunch of posts about the artist’s experience of drawing on paper with a marker. When I wrote about it just now, you can see some of the amazing colors he got from the paper. But the art piece I received is a mosaic of colored squares that are only about the right size for me to hold in my hand.
So the artist is taking a photo of a piece of paper and putting colored dots on top of it. But then they are only about the right size so the dots are so tiny they are almost invisible. They are still there, just not as pronounced. They are still there, but they are much more subtle than when they were first printed on paper.
If you’re wondering why the art piece has a “paper” in the title, that’s because it was originally intended as paper, but because of its subtlety and how it was originally printed, the artist added layers of plastic to make it look like a mosaic. I know it seems odd, but the results are pretty amazing.
A lot of mosaic art with a paper title is the result of someone wanting to create a title as a way of describing the piece. This is not always the case, but its something that happened here. We’re not too surprised this particular example was chosen though, because it was also the artist’s first attempt at making a piece that looked like a mosaic.
I will say that the piece is not entirely without its flaws. The piece does seem to be more of a mosaic, at least in that the paper is more of a background than a focal point. The pieces that are more of a focal point are the ones that are also the most interesting, such as the artist’s own piece.
The piece does have it’s own flaws, and a few of those flaws are really pretty bad. The biggest issue is the piece doesn’t look like any real mosaic, especially compared to the image they used for the paper. The mosaic on the piece is actually a bunch of paper with the same background. The paper is a much larger piece than the piece itself, and the colors are different (red and orange).
The thing is, the paper on the mosaic is just a paper, so that doesn’t make it any less of a focal point. I guess you could argue that the paper has a smaller focal point, but it doesn’t have the same kind of consistency that you get from a mosaic.
