Share This Article
Many businesses have a security or security insurance policy in place, and many of these insurance policies are covered by one’s home-owners insurance. However, many homeowners do not have homeowners insurance and are not aware that their insurance policy may not cover the liability of an intruder’s home. This leaves homeowners at the mercy of the insurance companies.
The best way to protect yourself is to take precautions. If you have liability insurance, make sure it covers any damages on your own property, and also that your homeowners insurance doesn’t cover anyone trespassing on your property. It’s also important to consider the damage that you’ve suffered if a thief breaks in and steals your electronics, furniture, or other personal property.
A great way to protect yourself is to hire a professional locksmith that understands the ins and outs of the local laws. Many cities have codes and ordinances that cover this issue. This includes, for example, the Los Angeles City Code Section 8.1.18, which covers the liability of intruders. If you do run into this issue, check your local ordinances and see if they cover intruders, and also check the codes and ordinances in your area.
In this particular case, it seems that the issue was with the locksmith and not the burglars. Because the locksmith was a good guy, I’m not sure how the burglars would have been held liable. I’m also not sure that the locksmith would have had to issue a citation to the burglars, but then again, I’m not a lawyer.
Check your local ordinances and codes and see if you would be covered if you are the victim of an intrusion.
No, not just to the same rules as everyone else. The ordinance says that it’s illegal to take someone’s property unless they’re in immediate danger. The ordinance does not say that it’s illegal to break in someone’s home to steal their money. The ordinance only says that it’s illegal to do so if the owner is threatened with physical harm or death. That last part is usually the problem.
This makes sense. If you break into someone’s home and they don’t complain, you might think they are in imminent danger. If they do complain, however, they may be in danger. If they don’t complain, you might think they are in imminent danger. It’s hard to tell which is worse.
It seems to be a little tricky to prove which is worse to me. I guess I am still trying to figure out whether or not being threatened with physical harm counts as being in imminent danger.
We were joking about this, but I think the only way to make sure you’re not in imminent danger is to find out for yourself. If you have the option of being threatened with physical harm, do that. Otherwise, be cautious.
I know security finance baytown is one of those games that can be played as a tense game of Risk, but that doesn’t mean it is always about risk. In fact, for the most part it is really about being cautious. I would bet that the game is about 80% risk, and 20% cautious. I guess that is pretty good.
